Sunday, August 30, 2015

Our World is Not THE World

For the last week Saratoga was abuzz with the upcoming Travers race at the Track. A Triple Crown winner would race at the Track and people and the local media could not be more excited. Personally, horse racing doesn't interest me but I live in this town and many people make their living because of the racing season.

This morning I opened the Sunday New York Times and could not find one article on the Travers in the Sports Section....NOT one.

The Travers is considered the 4th leg of the Triple Crown and one of the few national newspapers had no reports on the race.

Then I understood. Just because something is important in our small world, it doesn't mean that others feel the importance of a particular event.

Just food for thought.

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Technology and Dentistry

In the old days, printers for computers were the bane of every owners existence. They were not predictable, computers couldn't connect to them and they were a maintenance problem. Fast forward 10 years and printers became rock solid and a good business Hewlett Packard printer lasted 10 years without any problems or repairs...And even after I took the 10 year old machine home, it was still performing 7 or 8 years later.

And then something happened...Lasting forever wasn't good enough and folks wanted cheaper printers and HP and Epson gave us really cheap printers....They drove you crazy with paper jams and ink usage but man were they cheap...and you had to buy a new one every few years. (Rumor had it that the manufacturers would give you the machine for free because it was the inks where they made their profits.)

We are having a very similar thing happen in dentistry. Dentistry, when done well,  can last 2 decades but about 10 years ago, people not only wanted 20 years of usage from their dental work but they wanted it cheap. So now, fillings and crowns last a few years and get redone again and again.

I don't know about you but I would pay more and sit in the dental chair less.

Friday, August 28, 2015

I Don't Get It

There is something strange about some of our senior citizens. They dress presentably, have their hair and nails impeccably done and they go on nice trips.

Today at Compton's ( the local diner on Broadway frequented by locals and visitors alike) there was a slew of older folks that looked 10 years older than their chronological age i.e. 72 yrs old. Why????
Because their dentures are 30 years old, ill fitting and and fail to support the face...

Have we banned mirrors? With all the photos taken by cell phone, do people not look at themselves?

We don't wear 30 year old shoes.
We don't drive 30 year old tires or cars.
We don't keep our kitchens for 30 years.

Come on old people...you are making the rest of us look bad. Buy a new denture for heavens sake.

Geeez. (exasperation)

Thursday, August 27, 2015

It's Criminal 2

In my previous blog, I  told you about the 28 year old who went to a Corporate style dental center and was told that she had serious (spelled expensive) dental problems but had the good fortune of having a friend refer her to Root Canal Experts (RCE) before severe damage was inflicted on her.

Another of my patients, also referred from RCE was not quite so lucky. She had had 3 root canals and 3 canals done in Brooklyn and all three had failed and become re-infected. She was at a hair salon in Latham and met someone who had been treated by RCE and was very happy with the results.

Now some background information: This 34 year old was from the Caribbean and she had almost perfect teeth. Yes she had fallen and broke her front teeth but that is no big deal; 95% of the time, the endodontist performs a root canal and I place a very conservative bonded filling that will look great for years. Unfortunately, the dentist did 3 root canals and placed crowns on all three teeth. Fortunately, the two lower teeth could be saved by re-doing the root canals and replacing the crowns. Unfortunately, the upper front central incisor had to be extracted and an implant placed.

I cannot impress upon you the importance of finding fabulous physicians and dentists to take care of YOU. You are at severe risk of losing your life, your health, your teeth or your money.

This is a choice and there is something that YOU can do to keep yourself healthy and at the same time not break the bank.

It"s Criminal

I saw a new patient today who had been examined at a corporate style dental practice. The twenty eight year old woman was told that she needed two root canals and three crowns. Obviously, the patient was upset with her diagnosis and treatment plan. Fortunately, she spoke with one of her childhood friends who had had a root canal by Dr. Banchs and she told her that she needed a second opinion.

Dr. Banchs found no need for root canal therapy and could find no reason for any crowns. He told his patient that he thought that she needed to find a new dentist and made some recommendations.

When I examined my patient's x-rays and her teeth, I knew that this patient had been 'misinformed.'
What I did see is retained tooth decay under some resin fillings.

I am sorry...people can make as much money as they want as long as it is honestly earned and benefits the patient, the customer or the client.

How much have Dr. Banchs and I saved the patient? Two root canals and three crowns would roughly cost $8,000. The patient will pay less than $1,000 for her three direct resin bonded fillings.
And people say that I am expensive.

You can always trust Root Canal Experts and me to do the right thing...take care of YOU.

Saturday, August 22, 2015

REALLY?????

We flew in from Charlotte where we had spent three days. On the return flight home, the almost teenager releases his seatbelt as we are still moving towards gate. The stewardess YELLS at the child to sit down and put the seatbelt back on.  His ignorant father pays no attention to what his child is doing because he is deeply engrossed on his cell phone.

In the baggage area, the same child ran full speed across the room paying little attention to other passengers. Again the jerk of a father (Do you think I have any respect for this man?) does not care what his son is doing which places the rest of the people in the area at risk of hurting the child or themselves.

I am sorry...None of us has to be nice to an idiot of a parent. If someone wants to be a parent then they have to be a parent and pay attention to their children and not the damn cell phone...And you can bet that he would be the first to sue the airline for not protecting his child.

Don't make me use bad language.

The Call That I Won't Return

I truly believe that our office does a better job than the average dental office in taking care of our patients. Donna will call Root Canal Experts or an oral surgeon's office to get you the first available appointment when you are having a significant problem. We WANT to take care of you. Are we perfect? Of course not...we are human.

It has always been my policy to take care of out of town visitors who have a dental emergency. It is also my policy to provide care for YOUR guests who visit you and have a dental emergency.

Last night at 11 PM I received a call and voicemail from a FORMER patient asking me to see one of her friends from out of town who broke her tooth. Did you note that I said former patient?

I will not go out of my way to help someone who leaves our practice because I do not accept their insurance or because my fees are too high. (Please read my previous blog on what dentists earn) I Will go out of my way to help my patient whenever they need me.

You can bet your life that my FORMER patient called HER new dentist and he probably wouldn't accept her call either...but for a different reason....He or she will not go out of their way to help a guest of one of the patients.

Think about that!

Just So That You Know

Vox Topics just posted this story about dentists incomes.
As I have told you before, the average dentist's overhead is about 70%. I charge you a $1 and .70 cents goes to run the office. Of the remaining 30 cents, 50% or 15 cents goes to pay government in all the forms of taxation: Federal, State, Saratoga City and County, Social Security, Medicare and NY State Sales Tax ~8.5%. The dentist's income is not what people think it is.

http://www.vox.com/2015/7/29/9066361/cecil-dentists-afford-vacation
TOPICS 
     
       
  •  

How a dentist from Minnesota could afford a $50,000 African hunting vacation

(BBC)
There are big questions surrounding the death of Cecil the lion, like whether it was legal for a dentist from Minnesota to kill the animal or if his killing is a part of a much larger, human threat facing lions today.
Then there are some small questions, too: How does a dentist from Minnesota afford a hunting experience that reportedly cost $50,000? Is that type of luxury vacation within the reach of someone in his line of work?
The short answer: It really depends on how thrifty of a saver the dentist, Walter James Palmer, was. We don't know his financial situation, whether he had other sources of income, or how much, exactly, he earns. But the best data available on dentists' earnings suggests that buying a five-figure vacation would be a pretty significant purchase relative to income.
The average dentist in the United States earned $180,950 in 2013, the most recent year for which the American Dental Association provides data. There is a good deal of variation, however, in earnings: The lowest-paid quarter of dentists earn an average of $100,000, while the highest-paid quarter net $234,000.
Dentists' earnings are slightly lower than those of primary care doctors, who earn an average of $195,000, and much lower than specialty doctors, like cardiologists, who earn an average of $376,000.
The recession appears to have been especially tough on dentists, too. An American Dental Association brief from December 2014 showed that dentists' income, when adjusted for inflation, has declined from a peak average of $215,876 in 2005 to $180,950 in 2013.
The percentage of dentists who describe themselves as "not busy enough" — indicating a lack of patients — has ticked upward from 20 percent in 2007 to 36 percent in 2013.

Sunday, August 9, 2015

A True Hero: Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey

I have always been a reader of the obituaries in the New York Times because you often learn about some great people that I would otherwise never had heard about.

This is the obituary of a true American hero who saved millions of American children from being born without arms or legs.
'
Photo
President John F. Kennedy gave Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey the nation’s highest federal civilian service award in 1962, saying she had “prevented a major tragedy of birth deformities.” CreditThe White House 
The sedative was Kevadon, and the application to market it in America reached the new medical officer at the Food and Drug Administration in September 1960. The drug had already been sold to pregnant women in Europe for morning sickness, and the application seemed routine, ready for the rubber stamp.
But some data on the drug’s safety troubled Dr. Frances Oldham Kelsey, a former family doctor and teacher in South Dakota who had just taken the F.D.A. job in Washington, reviewing requests to license new drugs. She asked the manufacturer, the William S. Merrell Company of Cincinnati, for more information.
Thus began a fateful test of wills. Merrell responded. Dr. Kelsey wanted more. Merrell complained to Dr. Kelsey’s bosses, calling her a petty bureaucrat. She persisted. On it went. But by late 1961, the terrible evidence was pouring in. The drug — better known by its generic name, thalidomide — was causing thousands of babies in Europe, Britain, Canada and the Middle East to be born with flipperlike arms and legs and other defects.
Photo
Dr. Kelsey reshaped American drug safety rules.CreditAssociated Press 
Dr. Kelsey, who died on Friday at the age of 101, became a 20th-century American heroine for her role in the thalidomide case, celebrated not only for her vigilance, which spared the United States from widespread birth deformities, but also for giving rise to modern laws regulating pharmaceuticals.
She was hailed by citizens’ groups and awarded honorary degrees. Congress bestowed on her a medal for service to humanity and passed legislation requiring drug makers to prove that new products were safe and effective before marketing them. President John F. Kennedy signed the landmark law that she had inspired, and presented her with the nation’s highest federal civilian service award.
“Her exceptional judgment in evaluating a new drug for safety for human use has prevented a major tragedy of birth deformities in the United States,” Kennedy said at a White House ceremony.
Dr. Kelsey was appointed to the Order of Canada last month and presented with the honor in a private ceremony the day before her death at her daughter Christine Kelsey’s home in London, Ontario, where Dr. Kelsey had been living, according to John Swann, a historian at the F.D.A. and a friend of hers.
In 1962, the F.D.A. set up a branch to test and regulate new drugs, and Dr. Kelsey was put in charge of it. Later, she became director of the agency’s Office of Scientific Investigations, and in a distinguished 45-year career with the F.D.A. helped rewrite the nation’s medical-testing regulations, strengthening protections for people and against medical conflicts of interest. The rules have been adopted worldwide.
She was born Frances Oldham in Cobble Hill, on Vancouver Island in British Columbia, on July 24, 1914, one of three children of Frank and Katherine Stuart Oldham. Frances attended schools in Victoria and McGill University in Montreal, earning a bachelor’s degree in 1934 and a master’s in science in 1935. In 1936, she enrolled at the University of Chicago, where she earned a doctorate in pharmacology in 1938. She joined the faculty that year and became an assistant professor of pharmacology.
She and Dr. Fremont Ellis Kelsey, a professor in the university’s pharmacology department, married in 1943. He became a special assistant to the surgeon general in 1962 and died in 1966. The couple had two daughters.
Besides her daughter Christine, Dr. Kelsey is survived by another daughter Susan Duffield, two grandsons and a sister.
Dr. Kelsey received her medical degree from the University of Chicago in 1950. She was an editorial associate for the American Medical Association Journal in Chicago for two years before the Kelseys moved to Vermillion, S.D. He became chairman of physiology and pharmacology at the University of South Dakota medical school. From 1954 to 1957, she taught pharmacology there, and for the next three years was in private medical practice. She became a naturalized American in 1956.
Photo
Dr. Kelsey, in 2010, worked for the F.D.A. for 45 years.CreditBrendan Smialowski for The New York Times 
Her husband’s appointment to a post at the National Institutes of Health took the family to Washington in 1960. She accepted the F.D.A. job evaluating applications for licenses to market new drugs. Merrell’s was one of the first to cross her desk.
The company made glowing claims for Kevadon’s safety and effectiveness. It had been developed in West Germany, and since 1957 had been widely sold in Europe and elsewhere as an excellent sedative, Merrell said, giving prompt, deep, natural sleep without hangovers. Moreover, doctors had recently been prescribing it to women to suppress nausea in pregnancy.
Laws governing new drugs had been on the books for decades but were not always rigorously enforced, and F.D.A. approval was often routine. But Dr. Kelsey, working with a chemist and a pharmacologist, found the evidence for Merrell’s claims about Kevadon to be insufficient. She withheld approval and asked Merrell for more data on toxicity, strength and purity.
Merrell stood to make millions and was anxious to get moving. It had tons of Kevadon in warehouses, ready for marketing, and 1,000 American doctors had already been given samples for “investigational” research. The company supplied more data, but also mounted a campaign to pressure Dr. Kelsey. Letters, calls and visits from Merrell executives ensued. She was called a fussy, stubborn, unreasonable bureaucrat.
But she refused to be hurried, insisting that there was insufficient proof. In February 1961, she read a letter in The British Medical Journal from a doctor who suggested that thalidomide might be causing a numbing condition in arms and legs. She notified Merrell, and the company began its own inquiry. In May, she told Merrell that the drug might affect the limbs of fetuses. The company called the evidence inconclusive.
“I had the feeling,” she wrote after a meeting with company executives, “that they were at no time being wholly frank with me, and that this attitude has obtained in all our conferences, etc., regarding this drug.”
Six months later, European reports indicated that the drug was linked to an epidemic of phocomelia, a rare but monstrous malformation of limbs in newborns. Merrell withdrew its application as reports of the births of “thalidomide babies” came in from many countries. Kevadon samples given to American doctors were traced, but not all were retrieved. Seventeen births of babies with deformities were reported in the United States, according to the F.D.A.
Eventually researchers learned that thalidomide crossed the placental barrier and retarded development of the fetus, whose drug-metabolizing enzymes are undeveloped. No one knows how many babies were affected by thalidomide, but estimates range into the tens of thousands in Europe alone. Many were born without arms or legs, some with no limbs or with withered appendages protruding directly from the trunk. Some had no external ears or deformities of the eyes, the esophagus or intestinal tracts.
After an article in The Washington Post led to global coverage, Dr. Kelsey was hailed as a hero. She insisted that her pharmacologist, Oyam Jiro, and chemist, Lee Geismar, as well as her superiors share the credit. But attention focused on her partly because the Kennedy administration and its allies in Congress wanted to use the case to pass stronger drug regulations. The 1962 law required tighter proof of the safety and effectiveness of new drugs, full disclosure of side effects and generic names, and swift removal of unsafe drugs from the market.
When she became widely known, Dr. Kelsey, a tall, graying woman who spoke softly and never wore cosmetics, seemed modest to the point of shyness. But she testified in Congress, spoke to women’s groups and at college forums and gradually became accustomed to the spotlight.
In 2000 Dr. Kelsey was inducted into the National Women’s Hall of Fame, joining the ranks of Helen Keller, Eleanor Roosevelt, Margaret Mead and other luminaries. She retired in 2005, and in 2010 was honored by Dr. Margaret Hamburg, then the F.D.A. administrator, as the first recipient of an award that continues to be given annually in her name.